What Can Digital Reflection Tools Offer Between Therapy Sessions?

By Hendrina Sterling Rodríguez · Founder, Echo Journey ·

An educational overview, not clinical advice.

1. Why this question matters

People often ask whether journaling, mood tracking, or apps used between therapy sessions can meaningfully support wellbeing. It is a reasonable question, and the honest answer is: it depends on the kind of tool, the person using it, and the context in which it is used. Grouping every digital reflection tool together produces misleading claims in both directions — over-promising benefits and dismissing genuine research.

2. Four categories that are often confused

Before looking at research, it helps to separate categories that behave very differently:

  • Expressive writing — unstructured, private writing about difficult experiences, studied since the 1980s in short-term protocols.
  • Structured journaling — prompted reflection, gratitude logs, cognitive worksheets. Related to but distinct from expressive writing.
  • Mood or reflection tracking — logging feelings, symptoms or check-ins over time, often to support self-awareness.
  • Adjunct-to-therapy apps — digital tools designed to be used alongside a formal therapy programme, typically introduced and monitored by a clinician.

Evidence for one category does not automatically transfer to another. A study of an adjunct app used inside a clinical programme cannot be cited as proof that any journaling app "works", and vice versa.

3. What one recent study actually looked at

A 2025 feasibility and acceptability study examined the DBT Coach app as an adjunct within a comprehensive Dialectical Behaviour Therapy programme for adolescents (Ramzan, Camp & Tranah, 2025). A few points are worth stating precisely:

  • The study was published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist by Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press published the research; it did not create the DBT Coach app.
  • The study assessed feasibility and acceptability — whether the tool could be used and whether participants found it usable — not clinical effectiveness.
  • Participants were adolescents already enrolled in a comprehensive DBT programme, not a general population.
  • The app was used as an adjunct to formal therapy, not as a standalone intervention or replacement for treatment.
  • The study did not examine or endorse Echo Journey, nor any consumer reflection app. Its findings should not be generalised to all users, all therapies, or all digital reflection tools.

What the study offers is a modest, useful signal: within one clinical context, a structured adjunct tool was acceptable to the young people using it. That is meaningfully different from a general claim that "apps work".

4. What earlier research on writing suggests, with care

Separate from adjunct apps, there is a longer research tradition on expressive and structured writing. Reviews of expressive writing find small-to-modest benefits for some people on some outcomes, with wide variability (Baikie & Wilhelm, 2005). Professional bodies note that journaling can help some people notice patterns in thoughts and feelings, but treat it as a self-care practice, not a treatment (American Psychological Association, 2022). Public health guidance is clear that digital wellness tools are not substitutes for professional mental health care, especially in crisis or for diagnosable conditions (National Institute of Mental Health, 2024).

5. Where Echo Journey sits

Echo Journey is a consumer-facing educational reflection tool. It is not a clinical adjunct app, not a therapy programme, and not a mood-diagnostic instrument. It sits closest to the "structured journaling / reflection tracking" category, offering prompts and continuity between moments of self-awareness. The research above helps explain why some people find this kind of practice useful — and why it is not, and should not be presented as, a substitute for therapy.

If you are already in therapy, tools like Echo Journey are best treated the way any between-session practice is treated: something to mention to your therapist, so it fits your care rather than competing with it. If you are considering therapy, a reflection practice can help you notice what you might want to bring into a first session — it is not a replacement for that session.

6. Related reading on Echo Journey

To explore related topics on Echo Journey, see our public overviews on journaling for beginners, emotional regulation, and what Echo Journey is and is not.

Sources

  1. Ramzan, N., Camp, J., & Tranah, T. (2025). The DBT Coach App as an adjunct to a comprehensive DBT programme for adolescents: an acceptability and feasibility study. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 18, e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X25000017
  2. Baikie, K. A., & Wilhelm, K. (2005). Emotional and physical health benefits of expressive writing. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11(5), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.11.5.338
  3. American Psychological Association. (2022). Journaling and mental health. https://www.apa.org/topics/journaling
  4. National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). Technology and the future of mental health treatment. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/technology-and-the-future-of-mental-health-treatment

Echo Journey is an educational reflection tool. It is not therapy, diagnosis or crisis care. If you are in crisis, contact a qualified professional or your local emergency service.

Sources

  1. The DBT Coach App as an adjunct to a comprehensive DBT programme for adolescents: an acceptability and feasibility study — Tier 1
  2. Emotional and physical health benefits of expressive writing — Tier 1
  3. Journaling and mental health — Tier 2
  4. Technology and the future of mental health treatment — Tier 1